Celeron D 352 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking694not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.95no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.79no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads281
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KB16 KB
L2 cache3.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache35 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size306.18 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C69 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.25V-1.325V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt86 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17715
+6365%
Celeron D 352 274

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 86 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron D 352, on the other hand, has 39.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron D 352 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron D 352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Celeron D 352
Celeron D 352

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3960 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron D 352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Celeron D 352, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.