Atom Z3740 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.15
+2759%
Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Atom Z3740 by a whopping 2759% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6953005
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.7918.45
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache35 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °C90 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s17.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.15
+2759%
Atom Z3740 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17714
+2752%
Atom Z3740 621

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+285%
Atom Z3740 963

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+815%
Atom Z3740 3380

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 8286
+351%
Atom Z3740 1838

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 9.4
+1188%
Atom Z3740 0.7

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 6323
+303%
Atom Z3740 1569

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Xeon E5-2680 v4 26961
+930%
Atom Z3740 2617

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Xeon E5-2680 v4 2275
+187%
Atom Z3740 792

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 0.39
Recency 20 June 2016 27 September 2013
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 2759% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has 5900% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3740 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z3740 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4031 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.