Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5-2679 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 200 Watt
15.19
+572%
Ryzen 3 2200U
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.26

Xeon E5-2679 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U by a whopping 572% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4561818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency7.1914.26
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads404
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2525
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache50 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)53 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011-3FP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 15.19
+572%
Ryzen 3 2200U 2.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 24131
+573%
Ryzen 3 2200U 3583

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.19 2.26
Recency 20 June 2016 26 October 2017
Physical cores 20 2
Threads 40 4
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2679 v4 has a 572.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

Ryzen 3 2200U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2200U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2679 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 2200U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Ryzen 3 2200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2679 v4
Xeon E5-2679 v4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 45 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2679 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 536 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2679 v4 or Ryzen 3 2200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.