E1-1200 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking752not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.87no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeonAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date2015 (9 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$146 $74

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache3072 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm40 nm
Die size356 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C100 °C
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketLGA2011-3FT1
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
PowerNowno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 14711
+3782%
E1-1200 379

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms E1-1200 by 3782% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 995
+936%
E1-1200 96

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms E1-1200 by 936% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 6650
+3955%
E1-1200 164

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms E1-1200 by 3955% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2678 v3 is a server/workstation processor while E1-1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and E1-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3
AMD E1-1200
E1-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2320 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 261 vote

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2678 v3 or E1-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.