Core i3-380M vs Xeon E5-2678 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2678 v3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
9.51
+1119%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms i3-380M by a whopping 1119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7532540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.87no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeonIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date2015 (9 years ago)26 October 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49
Current price$146 $146 (3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz0.53 GHz
Bus supportno data2500 MHz
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache3072 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketLGA2011-3BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAno data+
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+no data
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2678 v3 9.51
+1119%
i3-380M 0.78

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Core i3-380M by 1119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 14711
+1127%
i3-380M 1199

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Core i3-380M by 1127% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 995
+200%
i3-380M 332

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Core i3-380M by 200% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 6650
+939%
i3-380M 640

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Core i3-380M by 939% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.51 0.78
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E5-2678 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-380M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2678 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-380M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Core i3-380M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Intel Core i3-380M
Core i3-380M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2320 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 420 votes

Rate Core i3-380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2678 v3 or Core i3-380M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.