A6-3400M vs Xeon E5-2676 V3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2676 V3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.51
+1035%
A6-3400M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.75

Xeon E5-2676 V3 outperforms A6-3400M by a whopping 1035% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8842650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency6.712.03
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateJune 2015 (9 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors2,600 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011-3FS1
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6520G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2676 V3 8.51
+1035%
A6-3400M 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2676 V3 13524
+1036%
A6-3400M 1191

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2676 V3 629
+198%
A6-3400M 211

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2676 V3 2308
+342%
A6-3400M 522

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.51 0.75
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2676 V3 has a 1034.7% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

A6-3400M, on the other hand, has 242.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2676 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3400M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2676 V3 is a server/workstation processor while A6-3400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2676 V3 and A6-3400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2676 V3
Xeon E5-2676 V3
AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 131 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2676 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 172 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2676 V3 or A6-3400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.