Xeon Platinum 8352M vs E5-2673 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2673 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 110 Watt
7.84
Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 185 Watt
28.71
+266%

Platinum 8352M outperforms E5-2673 v2 by a whopping 266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking887148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.762.15
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$596 $9928

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 has 28% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8352M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature°C77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.65-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 7.84
Xeon Platinum 8352M 28.71
+266%

Platinum 8352M outperforms E5-2673 v2 by 266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2673 v2 12128
Xeon Platinum 8352M 44406
+266%

Platinum 8352M outperforms E5-2673 v2 by 266% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.84 28.71
Recency 1 October 2013 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 185 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8352M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2673 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8352M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2
Xeon E5-2673 v2
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 66 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2673 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2673 v2 or Xeon Platinum 8352M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.