Celeron B710 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking863not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.29no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)15 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 2.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier2316
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache3 MB256 KB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)1.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size306.18 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011PGA988,PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13570
+12702%
Celeron B710 106

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2014 15 March 2011
Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v3 has an age advantage of 3 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron B710, on the other hand, has 242.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron B710 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron B710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Celeron B710
Celeron B710

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5353 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 78 votes

Rate Celeron B710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Celeron B710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.