Athlon X2 450 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.83
+951%

Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Athlon X2 450 by a whopping 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8802583
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.91no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.741.18
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128K
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size306.18 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 8.83
+951%
Athlon X2 450 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13578
+948%
Athlon X2 450 1295

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.83 0.84
Recency 8 September 2014 31 July 2014
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v3 has a 951.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X2 450, on the other hand, has 84.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2670 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X2 450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Athlon X2 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
AMD Athlon X2 450
Athlon X2 450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5525 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Athlon X2 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Athlon X2 450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.