A4-3310MX vs Xeon E5-2658

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
3.93
+671%

Xeon E5-2658 outperforms A4-3310MX by a whopping 671% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13782773
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,462no data
Current price$126 (0.1x MSRP)$136

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors2,270 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011FS1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 3.93
+671%
A4-3310MX 0.51

Xeon E5-2658 outperforms A4-3310MX by 671% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2658 6073
+677%
A4-3310MX 782

Xeon E5-2658 outperforms A4-3310MX by 677% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.93 0.51
Recency 6 March 2012 14 June 2011
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E5-2658 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3310MX in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 is a server/workstation processor while A4-3310MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 and A4-3310MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658
Xeon E5-2658
AMD A4-3310MX
A4-3310MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 26 votes

Rate A4-3310MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 or A4-3310MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.