Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
9.33
+678%

Xeon E5-2658 v4 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by a whopping 678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7722255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.981.35
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)19 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,832$42
Current price$169 (0.1x MSRP)$42 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 936% better value for money than Celeron G3900TE.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache35 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm298.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataLGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size1,536 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 9.33
+678%
Celeron G3900TE 1.20

Xeon E5-2658 v4 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2658 v4 14434
+680%
Celeron G3900TE 1850

Xeon E5-2658 v4 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 680% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.33 1.20
Recency 20 June 2016 19 October 2015
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Cost $1832 $42
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Celeron G3900TE is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Celeron G3900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658 v4
Xeon E5-2658 v4
Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 v4 or Celeron G3900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.