Apple M1 vs Athlon MP 2100+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon MP 2100+ and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon MPApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)no data
Release date19 June 2002 (22 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon MP 2100+ and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/sno data
Multiplier13no data
L1 cache128 KB2 MB
L2 cache256 KB16 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography180 nm5 nm
Die size128 mm2no data
Number of transistors38 Million16000 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon MP 2100+ and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)66 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 2100+ and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2002 10 November 2020
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has an age advantage of 18 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon MP 2100+ and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon MP 2100+ is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon MP 2100+ and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon MP 2100+
Athlon MP 2100+
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2222 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon MP 2100+ or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.