i5-13600KF vs Xeon E5-2658 V3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658 V3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.49
Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
23.80
+180%

Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2658 V3 by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking888211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.31
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency7.6512.44
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2420
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size356 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011-3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 V3 8.49
i5-13600KF 23.80
+180%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2658 V3 13487
i5-13600KF 37812
+180%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.49 23.80
Recency 8 September 2014 27 September 2022
Physical cores 12 14
Threads 24 20
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2658 V3 has 20% more threads, and 19% lower power consumption.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has a 180.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 16.7% more physical cores.

The Core i5-13600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2658 V3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Core i5-13600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658 V3
Xeon E5-2658 V3
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1855 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 V3 or Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.