Pentium D 960 vs Xeon E5-2650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.78
+819%

Xeon E5-2650 outperforms Pentium D 960 by a whopping 819% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12012759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.34no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Presler (2006−2007)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)23 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$91no data
Current price$46 (0.5x MSRP)$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)16 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per die)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °CC1=69 °C, D0=63 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011LGA775,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 4.78
+819%
Pentium D 960 0.52

Xeon E5-2650 outperforms Pentium D 960 by 819% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2650 7396
+816%
Pentium D 960 807

Xeon E5-2650 outperforms Pentium D 960 by 816% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.78 0.52
Recency 6 March 2012 23 April 2006
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

The Xeon E5-2650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 960 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium D 960 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 and Pentium D 960, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650
Xeon E5-2650
Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 163 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 18 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 or Pentium D 960, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.