i5-3340M vs Xeon E5-2650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.64
+173%
Core i5-3340M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.70

Xeon E5-2650 outperforms Core i5-3340M by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12942057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.34no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency4.624.60
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$91$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size435 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1023,FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 4.64
+173%
i5-3340M 1.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 7370
+173%
i5-3340M 2697

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2650 391
i5-3340M 525
+34.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2650 2447
+132%
i5-3340M 1054

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.64 1.70
Recency 6 March 2012 1 January 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 has a 172.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i5-3340M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3340M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-3340M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 and Core i5-3340M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650
Xeon E5-2650
Intel Core i5-3340M
Core i5-3340M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 178 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 176 votes

Rate Core i5-3340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 or Core i5-3340M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.