Solo U1300 vs Xeon E5-2650

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1280not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.34no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataCore Solo
Power efficiency4.62no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$91no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed2 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)2 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V - 1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 7370
+5703%
Solo U1300 127

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Solo U1300, on the other hand, has 1483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 is a server/workstation processor while Core Solo U1300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 and Core Solo U1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650
Xeon E5-2650
Intel Core Solo U1300
Core Solo U1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 178 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Solo U1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 or Core Solo U1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.