Celeron J1900 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.82
+1092%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 1092% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8102571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation87.78no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166$82
Current price$27 (0x MSRP)$163 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.42 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data224 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache30 MB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPPno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection--
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.82
+1092%
Celeron J1900 0.74

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 1092% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13649
+1087%
Celeron J1900 1150

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 1087% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 554
+220%
Celeron J1900 173

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 220% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 2679
+415%
Celeron J1900 520

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Celeron J1900 by 415% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.82 0.74
Recency 20 June 2016 1 November 2013
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Cost $1166 $82
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 10 Watt

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1374 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 184 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.