Xeon Platinum 8470 vs E5-2650 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
6.21
Xeon Platinum 8470
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 350 Watt
56.56
+811%

Xeon Platinum 8470 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 by a whopping 811% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking107223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.365.93
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.1915.29
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650$9,359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8470 has 151% better value for money than Xeon E5-2650 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)52
Threads16104
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 6.21
Xeon Platinum 8470 56.56
+811%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 9864
Xeon Platinum 8470 89850
+811%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.21 56.56
Recency 1 September 2013 10 January 2023
Physical cores 8 52
Threads 16 104
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 350 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 268.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8470, on the other hand, has a 810.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 550% more physical cores and 550% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Xeon Platinum 8470
Xeon Platinum 8470

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4454 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v2 or Xeon Platinum 8470, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.