Opteron 140 vs Xeon E5-2650 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
6.21
+2384%
Opteron 140
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 85 Watt
0.25

Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms Opteron 140 by a whopping 2384% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10743153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.46no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.190.28
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)September 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650$596

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm130 nm
Die size160 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011940
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 6.21
+2384%
Opteron 140 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 9864
+2391%
Opteron 140 396

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.21 0.25
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v2 has a 2384% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 140, on the other hand, has 11.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Opteron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Xeon E5-2650 v2
AMD Opteron 140
Opteron 140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4473 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Opteron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v2 or Opteron 140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.