Xeon X3230 vs E5-2640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.96
+207%

Xeon E5-2640 outperforms Xeon X3230 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14272272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.941.29
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)no data
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads12no data
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHzno data
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C60 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 3.96
+207%
Xeon X3230 1.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 6294
+207%
Xeon X3230 2052

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 1.29
Recency 6 March 2012 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

Xeon E5-2640 has a 207% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3230 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon X3230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon X3230
Xeon X3230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1096 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 25 votes

Rate Xeon X3230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Xeon X3230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.