Xeon L5638 vs E5-2640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.96
+70%
Xeon L5638
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.33

Xeon E5-2640 outperforms Xeon L5638 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14271790
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.661.73
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.943.68
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$90

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2640 has 112% better value for money than Xeon L5638.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C85 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 3.96
+70%
Xeon L5638 2.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 6294
+69.8%
Xeon L5638 3707

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 2.33
Recency 6 March 2012 16 March 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 60 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has a 70% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Xeon L5638, on the other hand, has 58.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5638 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon L5638, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon L5638
Xeon L5638

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1096 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon L5638 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Xeon L5638, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.