Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs E5-2640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.09

E7-4890 v2 outperforms E5-2640 by a whopping 389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1343255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.966.88
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)no data
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data
Current price$25 (0.2x MSRP)$1638

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 617% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads12no data
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C77 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
Socket2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes4032

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 4.09
Xeon E7-4890 v2 20.01
+389%

E7-4890 v2 outperforms E5-2640 by 389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2640 6327
Xeon E7-4890 v2 30946
+389%

E7-4890 v2 outperforms E5-2640 by 389% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.09 20.01
Recency 6 March 2012 1 January 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has 63.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-4890 v2, on the other hand, has a 389.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7-4890 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon E7-4890 v2
Xeon E7-4890 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1071 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 24 votes

Rate Xeon E7-4890 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Xeon E7-4890 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.