Celeron M 320 vs Xeon E5-2640

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1427not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.94no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency3.94no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Banias (2003)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/s400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)512 KB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.356V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 24 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 320, on the other hand, has 295.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 320 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Celeron M 320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1096 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Celeron M 320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.