i3-9100HL vs Xeon E5-2637 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2637 v4
2016
4 cores / 8 threads, 135 Watt
4.82
+142%

Xeon E5-2637 v4 outperforms Core i3-9100HL by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12491921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.86no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$996no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache10 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 1440
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2637 v4 4.82
+142%
i3-9100HL 1.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2637 v4 7434
+143%
i3-9100HL 3065

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.82 1.99
Recency 20 June 2016 1 April 2019
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon E5-2637 v4 has a 142.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

i3-9100HL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 440% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2637 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-9100HL in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2637 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-9100HL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2637 v4 and Core i3-9100HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2637 v4
Xeon E5-2637 v4
Intel Core i3-9100HL
Core i3-9100HL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2637 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core i3-9100HL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2637 v4 or Core i3-9100HL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.