Atom D2500 vs Xeon E5-2630

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2630
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.89
+2493%
Atom D2500
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.15

Xeon E5-2630 outperforms Atom D2500 by a whopping 2493% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14443301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.39no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.881.42
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$74no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data36 Bit
AMTno data-
HD Audiono data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB4 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes404
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2630 3.89
+2493%
Atom D2500 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2630 6183
+2466%
Atom D2500 241

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.89 0.15
Recency 6 March 2012 1 November 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2630 has a 2493.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Atom D2500, on the other hand, has 850% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2630 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D2500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2630 and Atom D2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2630
Xeon E5-2630
Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 110 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 36 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2630 or Atom D2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.