Phenom II X3 B73 vs Xeon E5-2630 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2630 v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.78
+578%

Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Phenom II X3 B73 by a whopping 578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10372477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.94
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.270.96
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Heka (2009−2010)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads163
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2258 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM3
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 6.78
+578%
Phenom II X3 B73 1.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 10372
+574%
Phenom II X3 B73 1538

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.78 1.00
Recency 8 September 2014 1 October 2009
Physical cores 8 3
Threads 16 3
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2630 v3 has a 578% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 11.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2630 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 B73 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2630 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X3 B73 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Phenom II X3 B73, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
Xeon E5-2630 v3
AMD Phenom II X3 B73
Phenom II X3 B73

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 751 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2630 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 B73 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2630 v3 or Phenom II X3 B73, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.