i5-13490F vs Xeon E5-2630 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2630 v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.65
Core i5-13490F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
17.68
+166%

Core i5-13490F outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1040360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.74
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.2725.26
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size356 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA20111700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 6.65
i5-13490F 17.68
+166%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2630 v3 10372
i5-13490F 27559
+166%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.65 17.68
Recency 8 September 2014 10 February 2023
Physical cores 8 10
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

i5-13490F has a 165.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 25% more physical cores, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13490F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2630 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2630 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13490F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Core i5-13490F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Intel Core i5-13490F
Core i5-13490F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 753 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 162 votes

Rate Core i5-13490F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2630 v3 or Core i5-13490F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.