Atom C3758 vs Xeon E5-2620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.42
+14.8%

Xeon E5-2620 outperforms Atom C3758 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14841570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.730.36
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36$193
Current price$72 (2x MSRP)$1359 (7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 has 381% better value for money than Atom C3758.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)448 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature77 °C82 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size384 GB256 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanes4016
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 3.42
+14.8%
Atom C3758 2.98

Xeon E5-2620 outperforms Atom C3758 by 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2620 5291
+14.7%
Atom C3758 4614

Xeon E5-2620 outperforms Atom C3758 by 15% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.42 2.98
Recency 6 March 2012 15 August 2017
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 8
Cost $36 $193
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

The Xeon E5-2620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3758 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 508 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.