i9-12900F vs Xeon E5-2609 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2609 v4
2016
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
3.49
Core i9-12900F
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
23.38
+570%

Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v4 by a whopping 570% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1548225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.43no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency3.8133.41
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$306no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 6.4 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246.24 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2609 v4 3.49
i9-12900F 23.38
+570%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2609 v4 5443
i9-12900F 36452
+570%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2609 v4 447
i9-12900F 2526
+465%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2609 v4 2878
i9-12900F 13683
+375%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.49 23.38
Recency 20 June 2016 4 January 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 24
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

i9-12900F has a 569.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2609 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2609 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-12900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core i9-12900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
Xeon E5-2609 v4
Intel Core i9-12900F
Core i9-12900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 149 votes

Rate Core i9-12900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2609 v4 or Core i9-12900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.