Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon E5-2609 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2609 v4
2016
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
3.56
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.32
+246%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v4 by a whopping 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1534640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency3.8165.95
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$306no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 6.4 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2609 v4 3.56
Ultra 7 258V 12.32
+246%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2609 v4 5443
Ultra 7 258V 18819
+246%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.56 12.32
Recency 20 June 2016 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 258V has a 246.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2609 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2609 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2609 v4 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
Xeon E5-2609 v4
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2609 v4 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.