FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2450
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.74
+20.3%
FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
3.94

Xeon E5-2450 outperforms FX-9370 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12581433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.74no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.721.69
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)6 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size294 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data57 °C
Number of transistors1,270 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1356AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2450 4.74
+20.3%
FX-9370 3.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2450 7534
+20.4%
FX-9370 6255

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.74 3.94
Recency 14 May 2012 6 July 2013
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 220 Watt

Xeon E5-2450 has a 20.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 131.6% lower power consumption.

FX-9370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Xeon E5-2450 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2450 is a server/workstation processor while FX-9370 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2450 and FX-9370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2450
Xeon E5-2450
AMD FX-9370
FX-9370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 125 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 159 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2450 or FX-9370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.