FX-6120 vs Xeon E5-2440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2440
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.94
+57%

Xeon E5-2440 outperforms FX-6120 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13691661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.331.41
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$295no data
Current price$1175 (4x MSRP)$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6120 has 327% better value for money than Xeon E5-2440.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads126
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size294 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors1,270 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1356AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2440 3.94
+57%
FX-6120 2.51

Xeon E5-2440 outperforms FX-6120 by 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2440 6091
+56.7%
FX-6120 3887

Xeon E5-2440 outperforms FX-6120 by 57% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.94 2.51
Recency 14 May 2012 23 October 2012
Threads 12 6

The Xeon E5-2440 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6120 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2440 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6120 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2440 and FX-6120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2440
Xeon E5-2440
AMD FX-6120
FX-6120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 90 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 33 votes

Rate FX-6120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2440 or FX-6120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.