i9-12900KF vs Xeon E5-2403

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2403
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.55
Core i9-12900KF
2021
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
26.87
+1634%

Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2403 by a whopping 1634% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2142186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2937.25
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i9
Power efficiency1.7719.60
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)27 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$230$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-12900KF has 12745% better value for money than Xeon E5-2403.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rate6.4 GT/s8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size294 mm2215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1356FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size384 GB128 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2403 1.55
i9-12900KF 26.87
+1634%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2403 2367
i9-12900KF 41119
+1637%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 26.87
Recency 14 May 2012 27 October 2021
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 24
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2403 has 56.3% lower power consumption.

i9-12900KF, on the other hand, has a 1633.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 300% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Core i9-12900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2403 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2403 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-12900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2403 and Core i9-12900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2403
Xeon E5-2403
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Core i9-12900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2403 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 540 votes

Rate Core i9-12900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2403 or Core i9-12900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.