Pentium M 738 vs Xeon E5 1680 v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking854not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.95no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Pentium M
Power efficiency6.05no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/s400 MHz
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache20 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Pentium M 738.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5 1680 v4 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 738, on the other hand, has 1300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Pentium M 738. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5 1680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium M 738 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Pentium M 738, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Intel Pentium M 738
Pentium M 738

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 66 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Pentium M 738 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or Pentium M 738, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.