Celeron 867 vs Xeon E5-1650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1181not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.96no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$175$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1650 8113
+1344%
Celeron 867 562

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 1 January 2012
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron 867, on the other hand, has 664.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1650 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 867 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron 867, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650
Xeon E5-1650
Intel Celeron 867
Celeron 867

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 494 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron 867 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 or Celeron 867, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.