Celeron 817 vs Xeon E5-1650 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	913	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.48	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	Intel Xeon E5	Intel Celeron
Architecture codename	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$617	no data
Current price	$69 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	12	2
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus support	5 GT/s	4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache	64K (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	256K (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	15 MB (shared)	2 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	246.24 mm2	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	69 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	69 °C	no data
Number of transistors	3,400 million	504 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA2011	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	no data
AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	no data	+
AVX	+	no data
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400	no data
Maximum memory size	1.5 TB	16 GB
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	6	2
Threads	12	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	17 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---