i3-1125G4 vs Xeon E5-1620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.83
Core i3-1125G4
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
6.28
+64%

Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14771082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.67no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency2.6920.45
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$313no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature64 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size375 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 3.83
i3-1125G4 6.28
+64%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 5862
i3-1125G4 9617
+64.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1620 610
i3-1125G4 1440
+136%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1620 2248
i3-1125G4 4050
+80.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.83 6.28
Recency 6 March 2012 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

i3-1125G4 has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 364.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-1125G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-1125G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 and Core i3-1125G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620
Intel Core i3-1125G4
Core i3-1125G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 168 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 380 votes

Rate Core i3-1125G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 or Core i3-1125G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.