Celeron 3765U vs Xeon E5-1620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.79
+368%

Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13942504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.22no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release dateMarch 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$313$107
Current price$44 (0.1x MSRP)$369 (3.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size294 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1270 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSXno data-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size375 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 3.79
+368%
Celeron 3765U 0.81

Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Celeron 3765U by 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-1620 5856
+368%
Celeron 3765U 1252

Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Celeron 3765U by 368% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.79 0.81
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Cost $313 $107
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

The Xeon E5-1620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 3765U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 and Celeron 3765U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620
Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 160 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 or Celeron 3765U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.