Xeon E3120 vs E5-1620 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 140 Watt
4.40
+394%

Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Xeon E3120 by a whopping 394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13362541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.971.30
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache10 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature66 °C72 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 v3 4.40
+394%
Xeon E3120 0.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 v3 6993
+397%
Xeon E3120 1408

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 0.89
Recency 8 September 2014 1 July 2008
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v3 has a 394.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3120, on the other hand, has 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E3120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Intel Xeon E3120
Xeon E3120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 133 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v3 or Xeon E3120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.