Phenom II X4 X920 BE vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v2
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
4.28
+183%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.51

Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13832160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.10no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data4x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency3.003.06
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011S1
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXHyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.28 1.51
Recency 1 September 2013 12 May 2010
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a 183.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom II X4 X920 BE, on the other hand, has 188.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 X920 BE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X4 X920 BE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Phenom II X4 X920 BE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 X920 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Phenom II X4 X920 BE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.