Core i3-2332M vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v2
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
4.23
+386%

Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms i3-2332M by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13082456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.96no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)1 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315no data
Current price$25 (0.1x MSRP)$136

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 4.23
+386%
i3-2332M 0.87

Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Core i3-2332M by 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-1620 v2 6545
+384%
i3-2332M 1353

Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Core i3-2332M by 384% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.23 0.87
Recency 1 September 2013 1 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2332M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-2332M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Core i3-2332M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Intel Core i3-2332M
Core i3-2332M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 105 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-2332M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Core i3-2332M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.