A10-9700 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1607 v2
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.70
+17.9%

Xeon E5-1607 v2 outperforms A10-9700 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16241726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.153.64
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date10 September 2013 (10 years ago)27 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$90
Current price$62 $75 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-9700 has 217% better value for money than Xeon E5-1607 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size257 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,860 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.65–1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data+
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
VirusProtectno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Endurono data+
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes408

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1607 v2 2.70
+17.9%
A10-9700 2.29

Xeon E5-1607 v2 outperforms A10-9700 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-1607 v2 4169
+17.5%
A10-9700 3548

Xeon E5-1607 v2 outperforms A10-9700 by 18% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-1607 v2 522
A10-9700 646
+23.8%

A10-9700 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 by 24% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-1607 v2 1631
+3.1%
A10-9700 1582

Xeon E5-1607 v2 outperforms A10-9700 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 2.29
Recency 10 September 2013 27 July 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1607 v2 is a server/workstation processor while A10-9700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1607 v2 and A10-9700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
Xeon E5-1607 v2
AMD A10-9700
A10-9700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1607 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 393 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1607 v2 or A10-9700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.