Xeon X5460 vs E5-1603

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-1603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads
2.20
+34.1%

E5-1603 outperforms X5460 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17151953
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.510.33
Market segmentServerServer
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$57 $42

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-1603 has 55% better value for money than Xeon X5460.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.16 GHz
L3 cache10 MB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature64 °C63 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.6V - 1.35V0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching++
FSB parityno data+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066no data
Maximum memory size375 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth31.4 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1603 2.20
+34.1%
Xeon X5460 1.64

E5-1603 outperforms X5460 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-1603 3450
+34.3%
Xeon X5460 2569

E5-1603 outperforms X5460 by 34% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-1603 463
+10.2%
Xeon X5460 420

E5-1603 outperforms X5460 by 10% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-1603 1445
+24%
Xeon X5460 1165

E5-1603 outperforms X5460 by 24% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.20 1.64
Recency 1 January 2012 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 120 Watt

The Xeon E5-1603 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5460 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon X5460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603
Intel Xeon X5460
Xeon X5460

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 18 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 291 vote

Rate Xeon X5460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1603 or Xeon X5460, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.