Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Xeon E5-1603 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1603 v3
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 140 Watt
2.79
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.85
+432%

Ryzen 9 6900HS outperforms Xeon E5-1603 v3 by a whopping 432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1681473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency1.8940.15
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size356 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C95 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.65–1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011-3FP7
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1603 v3 2.79
Ryzen 9 6900HS 14.85
+432%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1603 v3 4427
Ryzen 9 6900HS 23585
+433%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 14.85
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 9 6900HS has a 432.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 266.7% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1603 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1603 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 6900HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Ryzen 9 6900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3
Xeon E5-1603 v3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 44 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 138 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1603 v3 or Ryzen 9 6900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.