Xeon Phi 3120A vs E5-1410
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1620 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 3.67 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
Release date | 14 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 17 June 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 57 (Heptapentaconta-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 228 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 10240 KB (shared) | 0 KB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 294 mm2 | 350 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 5,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.6V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 1356 | PCIe x16 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 375 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 May 2012 | 17 June 2013 |
Physical cores | 4 | 57 |
Threads | 8 | 228 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 300 Watt |
Xeon E5-1410 has 275% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 3120A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 1325% more physical cores and 2750% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1410 and Xeon Phi 3120A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.