Xeon Platinum 8280 vs E3-1585 v5
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8280 outperforms Xeon E3-1585 v5 by a whopping 290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1169 | 262 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.02 | 1.64 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon E3 | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Power efficiency | 7.70 | 9.53 |
Architecture codename | Skylake-H (2015−2016) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018−2019) |
Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $556 | $10,009 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E3-1585 v5 has 23% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8280.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 56 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 35 | 27 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1.75 MB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 28 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 38.5 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 171 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 84 °C |
Number of transistors | 2,300 million | 8,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCLGA3647 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
eDRAM | 128 MB | no data |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
FDI | + | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3L,LPDDR3 1600 MHz, DDR4 2133 MHz at 1.2V | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1 TB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | N/A |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
Execution Units | 72 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 5.49 | 21.42 |
Recency | 31 May 2016 | 2 April 2019 |
Physical cores | 4 | 28 |
Threads | 8 | 56 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Xeon E3-1585 v5 has 215.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8280, on the other hand, has a 290.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.
The Xeon Platinum 8280 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1585 v5 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon Platinum 8280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.