i9-13900K vs Xeon E3-1565L v5

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated89
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.97
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Core i9
Power efficiencyno data13.89
Architecture codenameSkylake-H (2015−2016)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2530
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size171 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L,LPDDR3 1600 MHz, DDR4 2133 MHz at 1.2VDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units7232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 5.24 6.15
Recency 31 May 2016 27 September 2022
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E3-1565L v5 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

i9-13900K, on the other hand, has 17.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and 500% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1565L v5 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1565L v5
Xeon E3-1565L v5
Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E3-1565L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1931 vote

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1565L v5 or Core i9-13900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.