Celeron E3400 vs Xeon E3-1535M v6

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1535M v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.02
+830%
Celeron E3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54

Xeon E3-1535M v6 outperforms Celeron E3400 by a whopping 830% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12272853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.723.72
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency10.560.79
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623$76

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron E3400 has 116% better value for money than Xeon E3-1535M v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA-1440LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics P630no data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1535M v6 5.02
+830%
Celeron E3400 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1535M v6 7968
+827%
Celeron E3400 860

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1535M v6 1223
+322%
Celeron E3400 290

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1535M v6 3750
+673%
Celeron E3400 485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.02 0.54
Recency 3 January 2017 17 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1535M v6 has a 829.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1535M v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1535M v6 is a mobile workstation processor while Celeron E3400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Celeron E3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6
Xeon E3-1535M v6
Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 104 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1535M v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 273 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1535M v6 or Celeron E3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.