Xeon E3-1268L v5 vs E3-1285 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1285 v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
5.06
+23.1%

Xeon E3-1285 v4 outperforms Xeon E3-1268L v5 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12061394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.63
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E3
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Skylake-DT (2015)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)19 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$377

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2122 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million1,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA11501151
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300Intel HD Graphics P530
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 5.06
+23.1%
Xeon E3-1268L v5 4.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 7808
+23.3%
Xeon E3-1268L v5 6334

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.06 4.11
Recency 2 June 2015 19 October 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E3-1285 v4 has a 23.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon E3-1268L v5, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1268L v5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
Xeon E3-1285 v4
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5
Xeon E3-1268L v5

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1268L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v4 or Xeon E3-1268L v5, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.