Xeon E-2436 vs E3-1285 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1285 v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
5.06
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.53
+187%

E-2436 outperforms E3-1285 v4 by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1205505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.60
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300N/A
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 5.06
Xeon E-2436 14.53
+187%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 7808
Xeon E-2436 22398
+187%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.06 14.53
Recency 2 June 2015 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2436 has a 187.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1285 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
Xeon E3-1285 v4
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v4 or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.